[x]

deviantART

 

It is very hard to be sincere.

Sat Jun 9, 2007, 9:02 PM
I have realized that the world of art is an easy place to find liars; for better or worse. Some of the lying is harmless: an artist tells a story with their art... They take you away from reality, usually to a place more pleasant. This kind of lie makes life a generally easier and less bitter pill to swallow.

Then there's the bullshit. As a witness and crafter of said b.s., I also find it easier and easier to spot. You never hear, "I made this because I just felt like it," or "I just created this because I was bored," now-a-days. If you have the opportunity to go to an art show, you can bet to find little novellas, nay, encyclopedia sets being called artist's statements. Shouldn't the art speak for itself? If the motive is spoon-fed to you in a little pamphlet, doesn't it negate any room to speculate or discuss or critique?

That being said, I have no solution for this epidemic either. This is due to the witnesses’ constant increasing interest in the Artist over their Art. While art is already one of the most egocentric forms of expression already, this growing interest will continue to fuel this ego until the artist becomes a brand. This also contributes to the endangered species of art speaking for itself. Notoriety is golden. It matters not what the four corners of a frame contains; they pay for a signature.

I suppose this is where this journal entry ends. I am more or less sorry if this had any negative impact on you as I have no more or less authority on the matter of lying and art than anyone else. In fact, I'm sure you already knew this. Bravo.

For better or worse.

  • Listening to: The quiet humm of the computer fans.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

I think you definitely make a good point, and it would be pointless for me to say that you're not the only one disillusioned in such a way.

However, at the same time, I think this can have a good impact on both artists and artworks. While the bullshit-conceptualization of doodling is irritating, I think it is good for artists to be held accountable for the work they produce. In my opinion, if you're making work that you can't explain or at discuss in some sort of discourse, what's the point? Even if it is only to say, "I was frustrated, so I churned this out to get the feelings out of my system." Art is about doing, and about a finished work, but it's also about thinking. Or at least that's what I like to believe. :)

Oh! And not to mention people like Jon Rubin, who are working on ';Projects' as opposed to traditional, hang-on-the-wall works. For this sort of art, the question isn't exactly whether the work speaks for itself, but which part is actually the work? Is it the project itself, the documentation, or the artist's statement?

Sorry I got so chatty, especially since I don't even know you!
P.S. Especially since this journal entry is from more than a year ago!
I understand where you're coming from, and I appreciate your thoughts! I also agree that artists should be accounted for when it comes to there work (but then we bring up the debate of an artist's responsibilty to society, yipes!:dizzy:)

I just believe that the thinking that comes with art should be left for the observer to make for themselves; you know, that it shouldn't be dilluted at all by what the artists WANTED them to think.

It's all opinions, though. haha

Journal History

Site Map